"Oho, the Wells Fargo wagon is a-comin' down on the Dow"

by: hotflash

Mon Feb 22, 2010 at 15:25:35 PM CST

Unfortunately, the financial environment that bred the current crisis was also bipartisan. Oh sure, we could blame Republicans Phil Gramm, Texas, and Jim Leach, Iowa, for introducing in 1999 the bill that repealed the Glass Steagall Act of 1933, an act which kept speculation tamped down. But those two Republicans only led the charge. In their wake was a 90-8 vote in the Senate, a 362-57 vote in the House, and a signature--as if it were needed--by Bill Clinton.

Not until January of 2010, a year and a half after the global economy wobbled on the edge of a chasm, only to be pulled back from the brink by almost a trillion bucks loaned to the very villains who caused the wipe-out, did Obama, with Paul Volcker at his side, propose reinstating many of the Glass-Steagall regulations. What took you so long?! And anyway, it's not as if a proposal strong enough to do the job will survive the butchering, compromising, and selling out that will go on during markup. If such a miracle did occur, Congress would freeze in a bi-partisan iceberg (real Dems vs. Rs and Blue Dogs) when it came time to vote on actual reform.

Part of the reason adequate reform isn't likely to pass is the banks themselves. They used taxpayer money from the bailouts to lobby against reform--and, they know how to spread the moolah to the right campaign coffers. Meanwhile, in 2009 the top five banks made their highest profits ever. And they paid bonuses amounting to $140 billion--about the amount of money it would take to cover the shortfalls in fifty states from the Great Recession that the banks caused.

Damn straight we're pissed.

The banks "have their boot on the neck of the American Dream." It's time to take it to the streets. At least that's part of the strategy that National People's Action has mapped out for pressuring the banks to stop ripping people off and start lending to small businesses and investing in communities. Last October, NPA led a coalition of groups that turned out thousands of protesters at the annual American Bankers Association convention in Chicago. They called it Showdown in Chicago, and now every time a TV station wants to illustrate the anger of the populace at the banks, they dredge some video of those protests out of the archives.

It's time to give MSNBC and CNN new footage. NPA plans to double down, triple down, quadruple down on the protests. There will be regional demonstrations in late April through mid-May. The plan is to focus on the two worst offenders and to turn the clubby atmosphere of their annual stockholders' meetings into circuses. All the members of last October's coalition--SEIU, for example, and the AFL/CIO--are itching to get going. Each march will involve at least a thousand, maybe far more--a flood of loud, angry and yet articulate protesters.

The NPA strategy is two pronged.

First, progressives can accomplish a lot by focusing their energy on regulators rather than on legislators: Ben Bernanke at the Fed, Sheila Bair at the FDIC, and John C. Dugan at the OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency). In Mexico, MO, Jordan Estevao, an NPA organizer, recently explained the strategy to activists at GRO, one of the members of the Showdown in Chicago coalition.

He asked how many of us had been to Bernanke's house to discuss the banking problem. Lotsa laughter. But, referring to the protests against Bernanke's nomination, Estevao said that "because we 'went to his house,' he's now ... afraid of us." NPA is scheduled to meet with Bernanke on March 9th to discuss the actions they feel the Fed needs to be taking. For example, NPA will urge Bernanke to see that the Community Reinvestment Act is enforced.