BlogAds

Show Me Progress blog advertising is good for you

Blogads

In KC? Join us for libations every Wednesday!
Drinking Liberally - Midtown KC

Vulcan's Forge:

The Midwest's Premiere Sterling Silver Jewelers
Vulcans Forge

Located in the heart of Westport -- The Original Kansas City

Californos Californo's: Elegant dining in a delightful atmosphere, located in the heart of Westport
Search




Advanced Search
Local / Regional Links
National Links

Missouri news, views, and issues - Show Me Progress

"Cynthia Davis rule: Ignore hungry kids, force-feed comatose patients"

  

by: hotflash

Sun Mar 07, 2010 at 16:05:36 PM CST


Despite the sorry shadow of its former self that the Post-Dispatch has become, editorials like this one keep me subscribing:

State Rep. Cynthia Davis, R-O'Fallon, whose "hunger is a positive motivator" beliefs earned her national renown last summer, has come out in favor of feeding people who don't want to be fed.

House Bill 1235, sponsored by Ms. Davis, would require mandatory feeding tubes for terminally ill patients - but only for those patients who have said they don't want them. The feeding tubes would have to remain in place for at least 60 days before they could be withdrawn.

During that time, nurses would have to place food and water in the patient's mouth at least three times a day. If the patient swallowed - either on purpose or by reflex - the tube feeding would continue indefinitely.

Davis' loopy logic is that the coming national health care program might engender those death panels the Rs were so distraught about, though she avoids that discredited term in favor of the phrase "people who are motivated by economics". Same idea.

Consider these two pieces of irony that the Post points out:

Ms. Davis, worried that national health care reform will lead to rationing, is sponsoring a resolution that would allow Missouri to "opt out" of the changes. But Medicare has been covering elderly and disabled Americans for 45 years, and no one ever has accused it of rationing their care.

But in 2005, Ms. Davis and her fellow Missouri House Republicans - "motivated by economics" - voted to ration health care by cutting Medicaid insurance for 100,000 people. The cuts ended Medicaid coverage for, of all things, feeding tubes.

Ms. Davis' latest bill would add about $8,000 in costs for each nursing home patient who receives an extra 60 days of tube feedings that she or he doesn't want. It would add about $56,000 for each hospital patient.

The summer feeding program Ms. Davis attacked last June cost $1.81 for each breakfast and $3.18 for each lunch. That irresponsible spending prompted Ms. Davis to offer a helpful hint. "Tip: If you work for McDonald's, they will feed you for free during your break."

Tip for Ms. Davis: Leave the intensely personal decisions about end-of-life care to patients and their doctors. Worry instead about Missouri's hungry children.

I have a question: Do we have enough nutcases in the House to pass HB 1235? Because I'm starting to get tired of seeing the rest of the nation point at Missouri and laugh.

hotflash :: "Cynthia Davis rule: Ignore hungry kids, force-feed comatose patients"
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email




Yes. (0.00 / 0)
...Do we have enough nutcases in the House to pass HB 1235...?

This has been another edition of simple answers to simple questions.

543,895 votes


Yes, in the house (0.00 / 0)
but not yet in the Senate. This reminds me of what Jay Nixon said on the the campaign trail. " Folks, these aren't your parents' Republicans!"
I've often said that the greatest gift my late mother ever gave me was direction not to let her be kept alive on feeding tubes or other bedridden life support systems. She worked hard her whole life and couldn't see a bigger waste of her money than to be hooked up in a hospital bed. Hospitalized and fading fast, the doctors and I made a decision to move to her to hospice the next morning. She passed that same evening. How someone could try to override a person's wishes and be considered a conservative is beyond me. Every now and then I need a little extra motivation to get out and get good people elected to public office. Cynthia Davis has provided all I need this spring.

We had a similar experience with my father. (0.00 / 0)
The decision was ours since he was already in a coma, but it was made out of love ... and the sort of practicality your mother showed.

Cynthia has a letter in the Wednesday P-D defending her bill:

The editorial's own calculations made my point that a national health care system could lead to cost/benefit ratios to determine who should be allowed to live.

The idea I have proposed is a safety net to protect patients from dying by starvation or dehydration by offering food and water if it can be tolerated and ingested orally. Our humanitarian instincts would not allow us to starve the most hardened criminal on death row or treat animals in such a cruel manner. This is inhumane and strips us of the dignity owed to each human being.

She makes the bill sound lovely, no? But she didn't refute the point that the feeding tubes would be mandatory for 60 days. And she's living in a paranoid world where cost/benefit ratios=death panels.


[ Parent ]
About
Read before posting:

Getting Started

Posting Guidelines

Diary Formatting Tips

Congressional Contact Info

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


SMP on Facebook
Show Me Progress on Facebook

Other State Blogs
News & Announcements

Powered by: SoapBlox