BlogAds

Show Me Progress blog advertising is good for you

Blogads

In KC? Join us for libations every Wednesday!
Drinking Liberally - Midtown KC

Vulcan's Forge:

The Midwest's Premiere Sterling Silver Jewelers
Vulcans Forge

Located in the heart of Westport -- The Original Kansas City

Californos Californo's: Elegant dining in a delightful atmosphere, located in the heart of Westport
Search




Advanced Search
Local / Regional Links
National Links

Missouri news, views, and issues - Show Me Progress

Carnahan tiptoes into combat waving a fiscally responsible banner

  

by: WillyK

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 13:00:03 PM CST


Taking a leaf out of the McCaskill "fiscally responsible" playbook, Robin Carnahan yesterday revealed that she was no slouch when it comes to pandering to the received wisdom about deficits:

From where I stand here in Missouri, I'm disappointed in the President's budget recommendation. Budgets are about setting priorities and it's time Washington started making fiscal discipline and tackling the long-term budget deficit higher priorities.

Carnahan even resorted to McCaskill's favorite cliche, comparing deficit spending to household finance:

Missouri families have to balance their checkbooks and our government should be no different

Problem is the comparison is not only trite, but wrong. As former Treasury Secretary Robert Reich puts it:

... If John Maynard Keynes taught us anything, it's that a federal budget is not at all like a family budget. In fact, it's precisely because families have to pull in their belts that the federal government has to let its belt out. When consumers and businesses aren't buying much of anything, the government has to fill the gap. That's the only way to get jobs and get the economy moving again. Once the economy is percolating, the government can pull back. By then, tax revenues will soar, and the long-term deficit will shrink.

Don't believe me?  Think about Herbert Hoover and the great depression. Then think about the prosperous, post-war years when Keynesian theory was given its head.

The Keynesian formula has worked well in the past, and can work well again - even the itty, bitty stimulus program (relatively speaking) that was put into place last spring has had positive effects. But it will only work again if we stop allowing our media and politicians to indulge in irresponsible rhetoric about "irresponsible" spending. At all costs, we should certainly hold our Democratic representatives accountable for more than leadership by slogan - al least when the slogan is demonstrably, disastrously wrong.

WillyK :: Carnahan tiptoes into combat waving a fiscally responsible banner
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email





It is maddening to see Robin Carnahan (0.00 / 0)
show no understanding of Keynesian economic truths. Two weeks ago, she won Clark's applause for her strong statement about the SCOTUS travesty of a decision regarding corporate contributions to campaigns. But this. This statement makes you wonder whether she's as, heaven help us, "centrist" as Claire. Or merely ignorant.

I want a DEMOCRAT running against Blunt.


I don't think she is necessarily ignorant .. (3.00 / 1)
just willing to pander to the perceived ignorance of Missourians - maybe a little Tea Part effect as well?  Sam Stein at HuffPo had this to say:

Statements like these follow the distinctively Missouri style of politics, where budget discipline and deficit hawkery are golden traits. It's the platform on which Sen. Claire McCaskill rode into office in 2006.

But for an Obama White House that is touting the deficit reducing measures it has thrown into the budget (from spending caps, to prospective cuts in defense programs, to "restoring some balance to the tax code") comments like Carnahan's don't help.




[ Parent ]
Federal Deficit Spending and "Show-Me State" Economics (0.00 / 0)
Ok, so maybe the average Missouri voter doesn't get Keynesian economics so well. The "Show-Me State" difference between our household budget and the Federal budget is our household doesn't get to print it's own money. We do though at times borrow money, and why shouldn't the Federal government also, at times, borrow money? Again thers's a "Show-Me State" difference. Our household has to demonstrate a plan to repay the loan, while the Federal government simply sells it's currency(treasury notes), hopefully to the highest bidder.
The simple fact that the US prints it's own trust-based money, while our households can't, makes comparing the two a political view and not an economic view.

The "burden of debt" argument is also somewhat specious since (0.00 / 0)
when households pay their debts the money goes to other households eventuall.  When we pay off our national debt, we are paying off ourselves so it always comes back to us.

[ Parent ]
To quote Stars Wars: (0.00 / 0)
I have a bad feeling about this.

Why do I get the sense that we're looking at Claire II here?

Ugh.  I really hope that I'm not here in 2 years screaming about how Carnahan is a McCaskill clone, runs scared of voters who will never vote for her and fail Dems on every core issue we stand for.


About
Read before posting:

Getting Started

Posting Guidelines

Diary Formatting Tips

Congressional Contact Info

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


SMP on Facebook
Show Me Progress on Facebook

Other State Blogs
News & Announcements

Powered by: SoapBlox