BlogAds

Show Me Progress blog advertising is good for you

Blogads

In KC? Join us for libations every Wednesday!
Drinking Liberally - Midtown KC

Vulcan's Forge:

The Midwest's Premiere Sterling Silver Jewelers
Vulcans Forge

Located in the heart of Westport -- The Original Kansas City

Californos Californo's: Elegant dining in a delightful atmosphere, located in the heart of Westport
Search




Advanced Search
Local / Regional Links
National Links

Missouri news, views, and issues - Show Me Progress

Voter ID Bill Revisited

  

by: Clark

Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 06:52:47 AM CDT


Since the lege is bringing back the zombie Voter ID bill, I thought I would repost in full a diary I did last summer. Seems relevant and all. -Clark

We dodged a bullet at the end of the last legislative session when Republicans failed to move a new voter ID bill through the Missouri Legislature before the session came to an end. So why bother with another post on the topic? Because we can't sit on our laurels, especially when the "victory" was just running out the clock. Whether it's voter caging, voter purging, or voter ID laws, Republican voter suppression methods are like zombies - they keep coming back until decapitated. So let's revisit what the voter ID bill means for Missouri, before Republicans resurrect it in the special session, or next regular session, or via ballot initiative.

Secretary of State Robin Carnahan and her office did an excellent job of assembling illustrative anecdotes from real people who would be affected if voters were required to present a government-issued ID (we are already required to present some sort of identification), but as they say, the plural of anecdote is not data. They also released an estimate of how many Missouri voters would be disenfranchised by the government ID requirement, which was about 240,000. But I was curious about where in Missouri these voters might live, so I requested a county-by-county breakdown of how many voters would be disenfranchised.

I was curious to see whether most of those affected lived in the big cities, since the elderly, the poor and minorities would be most affected, and the stereotype is that all poverty and people of color are collected in urban areas. Sure enough, in absolute numbers, Kansas City, St. Louis, and St. Louis County rank at the top of the list.

But added together, the outstate counties actually contain more of the potentially disenfranchised voters.  Out of 241,682 disenfranchised, only 40,900 live in the cities of St. Louis and Kansas City, and 57,200 live in the suburban counties of Saint Louis and Jackson. The rest live around the state. Greene County  alone (where Springfield sits) has 11,787 potentially disenfranchised voters to Jackson County's 10,365 (suburban KC - a population nearly triple that of Springfield.)

It gets a lot worse (illustrated with a map and tables!) below the flip.

Clark :: Voter ID Bill Revisited
You can make a good case against a Voter ID bill by looking only  at absolute numbers, but that's missing half the picture. I pulled up the totals for registered voters by county, and looked at the disenfranchised voters as a percentage of registered voters in the county (to control for the much denser population in the cities and suburbs.) Suddenly, a stark vision of just how bad a Voter ID bill would be for the entire state drops into sharper relief. In fact, the hardest hit counties would be rural counties. Let's look at a map. Blue counties are below 4% disenfranchisement, yellow means between 4-8%, orange is 8-10%, and red stands for greater than 10% who would be disenfranchised.

Mo Map.jpg

St. Louis County has the highest absolute number of potentially disenfranchised voters, but expressed as a percentage of total registered voters, it ranks just above Greene County. St. Louis City has the second highest absolute number, but ranks just above Jasper County (Joplin) if viewed as a percentage of registered voters.

11(!) counties would lose 10% or more of their voters. The hardest hit county is Schuyler, with a whopping 21.39% of its registered voters no longer being able to vote. Other counties  with big chunks of disenfranchised voters include Reynolds (20.64%), Pemiscot (15.81%) and Marion (15.14%)

This is a major concern not only for the presidential and statewide contests, but for races up and down the ticket. The people most likely to be disenfranchised are also most likely to vote Democratic. If we lose 5 to 20 percent of Democratic voters in counties all across Missouri, especially if many of the hardest hit are clustered together in state senate and congressional districts, it gets progressively harder to elect a Democrat in those districts.

Let's look at Wes Shoemyer (D-18), the Democratic senator from NE Missouri. He was elected in 2006 by 1,842 votes. If the voter ID bill were in place at the time, he wouldn't have been elected - 5 of the hardest hit counties are in his district. Knocking out the ability for Democrats to win downticket also hurts the chances of Democrats in later statewide contests, because the Democratic bench will thin out.

Beyond mere partisan concerns, giving the poor even less of a voice in our electoral system is the best way to ensure that those in need are ignored when it comes time to make state policy. And all of it in response to a problem that is completely made up. Not that I expect the Missouri GOP to care about that, since they are the ones concern trolling here, but everyone else ought to be outraged.

The full list of counties, in order of voter disenfranchisement percentage, is below for your perusal.

Voter list 1.jpg

Voter list 2.jpg

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email




At first I thought - nooooooo! (3.00 / 2)
I don't want to think about voter ID.  But then I remembered the lesson of FISA.  Never think you've got them beat.  They always come back.  

Thanks for your patient research for this posting. (3.00 / 1)
Let us hope that you wasted your time. Let us hope that we don't have occasion to link to this posting next spring as the Republicans gear up to muzzle the voters again.

worst case--Nixon does have a veto pen, right? (0.00 / 0)
I mean, somebody gave him one as a congratulatory gift, right???

Thank God for that (3.00 / 1)
But what if, say, the lege passes early voting along with voter ID requirements? Would Nixon veto such a bill? Or could the GOP even peel off some Democrats that way to build a veto-proof majority?

[ Parent ]
Clark, I may lack imagination but I cannot think of (0.00 / 0)
any sweetener that would entice Governor Nixon to sign a voter id bill.  As for other Dems in the General Assy, I guess anything is possible but it doesn't necessarily follow that just because someone is a moderate that they are willing to disenfranchise voters.

Boy I don't want to be proven wrong :<


[ Parent ]
Thanks for the reassurance (0.00 / 0)
This thing always drives me crazy. I remember last summer Chris Koster was still studying the situation, even as you'd think he would have been working hard to ingratiate himself with Democratic voters. Indeed he was, just not on this issue.

[ Parent ]
Whoops (0.00 / 0)
I think I just blew the "Jenny" whistle! Just kidding, Jenny.

[ Parent ]
Thank you for doing this work. (3.00 / 1)
It is helpful to me as a member of the Committee.

I see that several posters have the hope that Gov Nixon might veto the legislation.  That is a vain hope because the is an HJR; a bill which places a proposed constitional amendment before the voters.  In order to achieve their ends the proponents must amend the Missouri Constitution.  If the HJR were to pass both houses of the MO Leg it would go directly to the people, probably at the 2010 General Election.  The Governor has no veto in such a case.

If the Constitutional Amendment were to pass then the Leg would have to enact enabling legislation.  The Governor would then have veto power.  

Chris Kelly


And thank you for your input (0.00 / 0)
What are the odds that it will pass this session?

[ Parent ]
Question: (0.00 / 0)
Is it definitely the case that, in terms of total disenfranchisement, Voter ID + Early Voting would be worse than neither Voter ID nor early voting?  Would early voting help to limit some of the problems of an ID bill?  I'm definitely not advocating for voter ID, but I'd like to know exactly what the stakes are, and I'm starting to think that if we push for an early voting bill the Repugs and going to attach the ID thing for sure.

Ash asked if early voting would be worth photo id. (3.00 / 1)
IMHO, no but that trade is unlikely because photo id requires a constitutional amendment while early voting is statutory.  Chris Kelly

PS Have I mentioned what a star Beth Low is?


[ Parent ]
No, but she is (0.00 / 0)
Photo ID requires a constitutional amendment because of the MO Supreme Court decision, right?  

[ Parent ]
About
Read before posting:

Getting Started

Posting Guidelines

Diary Formatting Tips

Congressional Contact Info

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


SMP on Facebook
Show Me Progress on Facebook

Other State Blogs
News & Announcements

Powered by: SoapBlox